Reflections for
QCY522 microteaching
Things I did well
I anticipated
possible misconceptions that the students might have including Jimmy’s
representation of the repeat unit of the polyethene molecule. As such, I was
well prepared to answer such questions since I had given much thought to
explaining it earlier. I felt that I managed to give a reasonable explanation
that could be rationalized by students even though no such explanation has ever
been given to us when we were students, nor could it be found online.
The analogy of the
train carriages helped students to visualize the repeating units joining up.
Furthermore, the visual representation of the passengers alighting from the
train served as a useful reminder of the difference between the addition
polymer and condensation polymer.
The animations used
depicting how the ester linkages formed was another powerful imagery for
students to visualize. Instead of merely seeing the final product on the
screen, students get to see how the atoms join and where the oxygen in the
respective atoms go.
The use of the
Bakelite example allowed students to appreciate that knowledge goes beyond just
the curriculum. It was also an example of a condensation polymer so that
students can appreciate that such polymers were not restricted to just
polyesters and polyamides. Furthermore, as chemistry students, it is important
to have an appreciation of some synthetically or historically important
developments.
Things I can improve on
Firstly, my time
management was bad as I exceeded the allotted time by 6 minutes. This was due
to the slow polymerization reaction which was unplanned. In my initial trials,
the reaction took only 1 minute, but during the demonstration, it took 5
minutes for the reaction to occur. I had prepared a video initially so I should
actually have showed the video while waiting for the reaction.
Secondly, when I
asked for students to write their answers on the board, one student drew the
Lewis structure for the monomer. I should have spent a few minutes to explain
why there was such a geometry instead of skipping over it and marking it
correct.
Lastly, the
unreactive groups in the dicarboxylic acid and diol is commonly represented by
a box to represent that it is unimportant. Perhaps I should have spent some
time to show the full molecular formula of one such compound and show that it
can all be collapsed into the box to indicate why it is not involved in the
reaction at all.
Things I should not have done
The Bakelite
polymerization actually used toxic chemicals such as formalin and phenol.
Glacial acetic acid is quite pungent as well. In a normal classroom, this
reaction should not be carried out due to safety reasons. In a laboratory, this
reaction should have been carried out in a fumehood. However, I was worried
that students might not be able to get a good view of the reaction if it was
carried out in the fumehood.
No comments:
Post a Comment